BlueJar Fix Plan Implementation · Any Platform

Not on WordPress, Shopify, or React? You get the fix plan. We still ship it.

Webflow, Squarespace, Wix, Framer, a headless CMS, or something fully custom, every one of them guards <head>, robots.txt, and the site root a different way. Instead of handing you a checklist and hoping someone on your team finds the right settings panel, BlueJar's own developers go find your platform's actual levers and implement the fix plan directly: schema, llms.txt, and crawl access, shipped, not just written down.

Get an implementation quote → Start free audit first

Our developers work with Webflow, Squarespace, Wix & Framer · headless CMS & fully custom builds

Why we implement it ourselves

Every site builder guards its <head> a different way.

A fix plan that says "add Organization schema" or "fix your robots.txt" doesn't tell you which settings screen to open on Webflow versus Squarespace versus Wix, or what to do when your platform doesn't expose that screen at all. Our developers start every engagement by mapping exactly what your specific platform allows, then ship the fix inside those constraints.

4 panels

Webflow, Squarespace, Wix, and Framer each ship their own custom-code panel, none of them named the same thing or living in the same menu twice.

1 setting

Webflow lets you edit robots.txt directly in Site Settings → SEO. Other builders bury it, gate it by plan, or don't expose it at all.

3 checks

Head injection allowed? Direct control of robots.txt/sitemap? Can a static file like llms.txt sit at the true root? That's what we check first on any platform.

01 · Custom code injection, whatever the builder

We find your platform's code-injection panel and ship straight into it.

On Webflow, we use the site-wide head/body code in Site Settings and page-level embeds where a fix only belongs on one page. On Squarespace, we use Code Injection under Settings → Advanced, where your plan supports it. On Wix, we go through the Custom Code section for site-wide or per-page injection, or Velo when a site needs deeper customization. On Framer, we use the Custom Code panel, site-wide or per page. Same fix, four different doors, we already know which one to open.

✓We ship full @graph JSON-LD through whichever head-injection panel your builder exposes
✓We check plan-level limits first, Squarespace's Code Injection availability depends on your plan
✓We use Velo or a builder's dev mode only when the standard injection panel can't reach far enough

site-wide head code

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@graph": [
    {
      "@type": "Organization",
      "@id": "https://example.com/#org",
      "name": "Example Co",
      "url": "https://example.com/",
      "logo": "https://example.com/logo.png",
      "sameAs": ["https://www.linkedin.com/company/example"]
    }
  ]
}
</script>

02 · Crawl access: robots, sitemap & llms.txt

We take direct control of robots.txt, your sitemap, and llms.txt, wherever your platform lets us.

Webflow gives us a direct robots.txt editor and an auto-generated sitemap, so those fixes ship in minutes. Other builders don't offer a true root path for a static file like llms.txt, so we build the workaround: a subdomain, a redirect rule, or a small reverse-proxy rule at the DNS/CDN layer, whichever gets the file resolving at the real root without breaking the rest of the site.

✓We edit robots.txt directly wherever the platform exposes it, and add AI-crawler allow rules
✓We verify the auto-generated sitemap actually includes the pages your fix plan targets
✓We build the redirect or reverse-proxy rule needed to serve llms.txt at the true root

/llms.txt

# Example Co
> AI-visibility fix plan implemented by BlueJar

## FAQ
Q: What does Example Co do?
A: [inlined answer, not just a link to /faq/]

## License
Content on this site may be summarized and cited
with attribution to example.com.

03 · First, the platform audit

Before we touch anything, we map exactly what your platform will and won't let us do.

Every engagement starts the same way, regardless of whether we've built on your exact stack before: can we inject into <head>, do we get direct control of robots.txt and the sitemap, and can a static file sit at the true root or does it need a workaround. That three-question audit is what lets us implement inside your platform's real constraints instead of guessing.

✓We confirm head-injection access before scoping any schema or meta fix
✓We confirm who controls robots.txt and the sitemap, you, us, or the platform itself
✓We flag anything that needs a workaround up front, so there are no surprises mid-build

Platform audit → what we found

Head injection: available site-wide, custom-code panel confirmed

robots.txt / sitemap: direct editor available, no workaround needed

llms.txt at true root: not supported natively, reverse-proxy rule required

Effort: 20 min audit · Unlocks: every fix that follows

What a real Webflow implementation looks like

Not "add schema and fix your crawl access." Our developer, in the Designer, shipping it.

High priority Zone: Technical AI accessibility Stack: Webflow

What was broken

The client's Webflow site had no Organization or WebSite schema anywhere, and a request to /llms.txt returned Webflow's default 404. Webflow doesn't support uploading arbitrary static files to the site root, so the file simply didn't exist.

What we shipped

Added a complete Organization + WebSite JSON-LD @graph through Webflow's site-wide head code embed
Edited robots.txt directly in Site Settings → SEO to explicitly allow major AI crawlers
Set up a lightweight reverse-proxy rule at the DNS layer so /llms.txt resolves at the true root instead of a workaround subdomain

Timeline

45 min Schema live, robots.txt updated, reverse-proxy rule shipped and verified.
Ongoing Re-audit confirms llms.txt resolves cleanly and schema validates each fix plan cycle.

This is what happens to every fix in your plan: named down to the exact panel or workaround, then shipped by us.

Other platforms implementation FAQ

Is Fix Plan Implementation a separate service from the audit?

▾

Yes. The GEO audit and fix plan are their own product. Implementation is a standalone engagement on top of it: our developers execute the plan directly on your Webflow, Squarespace, Wix, Framer, headless, or fully custom site, whether you ran the audit with us or already have a fix plan from somewhere else.

What access do you need to implement fixes on our site?

▾

It depends on your platform: Designer/Editor access on Webflow, an admin login for Code Injection on Squarespace or Custom Code on Wix, or DNS/hosting-level access when a fix needs a redirect or reverse-proxy rule, for example to serve llms.txt at the true root. We scope exactly what's needed once we've run the platform audit.

Which platforms do you actually support?

▾

We regularly work across Webflow, Squarespace, Wix, Framer, headless CMS setups, and fully custom-built sites. If we haven't touched your exact stack before, we start with the same platform audit we run everywhere: what can be injected into <head>, who controls robots.txt and the sitemap, and whether a static file can sit at the true root path. That answer set works whether it's a platform we know cold or one we're seeing for the first time.

Will this conflict with our existing agency or in-house developer?

▾

No. We can work directly with your team, handing off exactly what we changed and why, or execute independently if you'd rather your team stay focused elsewhere. Either way, you keep full ownership and access to everything we ship, on whatever platform you're running.

How is implementation priced, and how long does it take?

▾

Pricing scopes to the size of your fix plan and how much platform-audit work is involved, most engagements run one-time, not a subscription. Critical and High-priority fixes are typically shipped within the first week; get a firm quote and timeline on a call.

Get the fix plan shipped, not just written

Tell us what platform you're on, Webflow, Squarespace, Wix, Framer, headless, or fully custom, and your fix plan (ours or someone else's). We'll scope the implementation and quote a timeline on the call.

Get an implementation quote → Start free audit first